|

|
|
|
Editorial - Root Boy 
You and Your Mac's Commitment to the Collective Success of National and Economic Security
By Duane Straub - Contributing Editor.
Buckle up and assume the position
The new year is on us- time for resolutions! I was gratified by the
response I received on my grandiose editorial of 7-7-02, "Ask Not
What Your Country Can Do For You, Ask What Your Mac Can Do For Your
Country." (
http://www.osxfaq.com/Editorial/USA/index.ws) Now,
inspired by an email chain letter (of all things!), I want to
continue my theme of asking you to take an active role, as
effectively as you can, in promoting and implementing secure,
technical solutions. At least I'm not asking you for money! ;-)
The chain letter that inspired me states that "science" has
discovered why geese fly in a "V" formation. "As each bird flaps its
wings, it creates an uplift for the bird immediately following. By
flying in a "V" formation, the whole flock adds at least 71 percent
greater flying range than if each bird flew on its own." It further
makes the analogy, "People who share a common direction and sense of
community can get where they are going more quickly and easily,
because they are traveling on the thrust of one another."
My thrust has been to promote to the Department of Energy and other
governmental organizations the idea of heterogeneous networks as a
defense mechanism. DOE, like most of the IT world, has reasoned that
"prevention" and "risk mitigation" is constituted by practices such
as turning unnecessary services off, or the computer itself, during
times it is not actively being used. Worthwhile suggestions, although
I believe computer security can be greatly enhanced by starting with
the choice of operating system. (Some insurance companies have
recognized that, offering lower rates to organizations whose primary
OS base is other than Windows.)
Current risk mitigation approaches eventually result in compromised
systems, and with potentially devastating effect in environments with
a high degree of platform homogeneity. Organizations can reduce their
susceptibility to catastrophic security breaches by diversifying
their OS base, limiting the use of inherently insecure, highly
targeted OSes. A recent study by mi2g concluded that 54% of all
cyberattacks in 2002 were directed at Windows OSes. The study
assigned "share" to about a dozen OSes, with Mac OS's share at 0.05%.
mi2g estimates the worldwide economic damage of cyberattacks in 2002
to be $40 to $49 billion. Apparently still insufficient cost to
change the modus operandi of most IT managers. WHY? In the private
sector, typically, the "bottom line" is cost. Does that mean
corporate IT managers simply don't know any better???
In my experience, pointing out the ease of use and administration,
general cost effectiveness, and security advantages of the Mac
platform is not enough- especially for Wintel-centric IT managers. My
department head (who is not anti-Mac) says it is not a cost issue,
but a performance issue. I'm not sure what specifically she means by
"performance," but certainly at issue in my work environment is
institutional application compatibility equal to that offered via the
Windows platform. With compatibility, IT folks have little to
complain about or object to- no reason to dismiss Mac OS over their
Wintel-centric enterprise applications, and no reason to promote a
"no matter what the costs" desktop platform to fit their solutions. I
think it is better to build enterprise applications to work with a
variety of client platforms, thereby freeing organizations from a
monolithic OS base that by nature places them at an unacceptably high
cybersecurity risk.
Often, when those in charge of money and direction are Windows
oriented, they do not on their own recognize the benefits of pursuing
simpler, *standards based*, more inherently secure desktop solutions
based on Mac OS X. Some organizations (including the computer
security organization at my work) do not want to recommend a specific
OS, fearing that on the heels of the recommendation a devastating
attack will be launched against that OS. This is certainly a
possibility, although I don't see how organizations of that type
could consider they're doing a thorough job while neglecting to
regularly point out clear differences in the security track records
of the OSes. Amazingly, most IT folks have no idea there is a
difference- focused in a Windows world, they simply presume everyone
has it as bad as they do.
Back to the chain letter... "When the head goose gets tired, it
rotates back in the wing and another goose flies point. It is
sensible to take turns doing demanding jobs, whether with people or
with geese flying south. Geese honk from behind to encourage those up
front to keep up their speed." I have appreciated the "honking,"
several years of appreciative encouragement from my peers and
compatriots in the Macintosh community, but I am certainly looking
forward to others in my organization and the community flying point.
(In no way do I mean to discount the hard work and successes of
others in the community, and those who have inspired me, particularly
John Martellaro and John Welch.) The community has made great
progress and I wish the "job" was over, but it's not. The focus has
broadened, yet become more defined- we need to develop solutions.
I just came out of Border's, getting my O'Reilly "Unix for Mac OS X"
book. (I say "just came out" because I'm writing this on the road- my
wife drives me on outings so I can keep working on my PowerBook. My
time is *that* tight, raising two young boys, trying to make ends
meet, and hobbies like Internet services hosting and the Root Boy
Slim Memorial Fan Club.) At Border's I noticed numerous OS X Java,
Cocoa, WebObjects, REALbasic, and other titles- keys to building new
enterprise applications or interfaces to existing applications.
That's what I want to do, build solutions, yet it's tough when the
playing field is not level. Take my place of employment for example-
one of the world's largest Macintosh sites. We have at least a dozen
or two or more people working on Windows enterprise solutions and
issues, and basically zero people working in parallel areas for Mac
OS/X. I and others have to do that on our own personal time away from
work, and until that's remedied, I need your help.
Final word on the geese... "If we have as much sense as a goose, we
will stay in formation with those people who are headed the same way
we are." I've given five Macworld Expo Pro Conference sessions on how
to advocate Macs to corporate IT, and networked with numerous
beleaguered Mac users and administrators over the last several years.
Although my efforts may not have effected you directly, for the
greater good of all, I ask for your help. Commit yourself to action,
contributing in manners that best take advantage of your knowledge
and expertise. There's technical work to be addressed, and there are
political and mindshare issues to be addressed. Like a tired goose,
I'm ready to rotate back into the wing and travel on the thrust of
others while redirecting my efforts. Honk! Honk! :-)
Words of warning:
Many IT managers are so narrowly focused they can't see that their
"big picture" is not a big picture at all. No matter how explicit the
arguments, many IT folks will dismiss the line of reasoning as Mac
zealotry. Up front, I tell people to use Windows, Linux, or Solaris
when any of those OSes are the right tool, but somehow they recollect
I said Mac, Mac, Mac... Mac OS is an incredible "hot button" and
threat to many IT managers. If someone suggests you're motivated by
Mac zealotry, you might point out there's no personal benefit in that
for you. And it's not for Apple- there's a slim chance Steve Jobs
will ever be at your door thanking you. Your motivation stems from
great consequence; it's for you, your family, your organization, your
country, and humanity.
DISCLAIMER: The views expressed here are not necessarily the views of my
employer, the Federal government, or the UN World body, and certainly are not
the views of anyone I might try to implicate should I be charged under the
jurisdiction of any local, State, or Federal Law Enforcement agencies. (For
anything the statute of limitation has not run out on.) So there!
E-mail comments to duane_straub@osxfaq.com
|





|