DirectNET

Data Center Management Solutions including UPS Systems, Data Center Cooling, KVM over IP & IP Power Strips, Server Racks and Server Rack accessories; KVM Switches and KVM Extenders; Rackmount Monitors and Rackmount Keyboards.


NAVIGATION
Home
Store
INSIDE MAC
Television Shows
Broadcast Shows
Daily News Shows
Special Shows
EVENTS
DAILY TIPS
Design
Mac OS X
Mac OS X UNIX
COMMUNITY
Surveys
NEWS
Current
Press
Archive
FEATURES
Editorial
Dr. Mac
Reviews
Reader Reports
RESOURCES
FAQ
Documentation
Learning Center
MAN pages
Glossary
Tutorials
Tips
Links

OUR PARTNERS

Editorial - Mac OS X in Enterprise and Education 

Note to self - When turning one's self into literal flame bait, coat with fire retardant..

By Dr. Tim Hillman, OSXFAQ Senior Editor - Enterprise and Education

My last offering supposed that X-enabled Macs make a better choice in a school environment for a variety of reasons. When posted on an advocacy news list, an enormous number of posts and threads popped up, with a score of readers jumping all over each other (and me) about education, and macs in education. With due respect to those individuals posting with good intent, let's take time to do a reality check.

First, for those that dismiss the messenger as a writer for an advocacy site, and therefore not deserving of trust, imagine for a moment that I'm actually writing outside my chosen profession. So what's the day job? Educator. 22 years on the job. Another 7 years in college, and 4 in high school. Six different schools, spanning the introduction of the Apple until now. In that time, I've worked on everything from mini-computers to Palms. Haven't used a Pocket PC yet. Probably a matter of time.

Job description as of today? Computer Department Chair, and responsible for integration of technology across the curriculum at an anonymous Catholic school. What school doesn't matter. Here's the rub though.

As you discuss technology in education, get a grasp on a simple fact. Noone has got this thing right yet, or are even close to it. Justification? Quick and simple. Please identify the killer app for technology integration. Or write it even- the world would beat a path to your door.

New technologies (because even a pencil is tecnology Bunky) are adopted in schools becasue the market demands that they are. Hence, school after school around the world has been turned into the home of a network that would satisfy many a small business. What are they doing with them? Less than you imagine. Take a ride on the following web site: ride.ri.net. That's the place where you can monitor internet use by schools across the state. You can check their bandwidth, use of bandwidth, and little more.

If you choose to take part in this little exercise, you will find that the Internet is used sporadically in many schools. Why? Despite the training they've been given, even young teachers are drawn to the craft from a desire to teach, and usually, that means teaching with their mouth and hands- not the high tech white board sitting in the corner. IT people will talk a great show, but the ugly secret is that much of this technology is going to waste.

Some teachers are making great use of the tools, and others won't touch them, even when their tenure is waved in their face. They do not believe in technology for technology's sake. they believe in sound practice and results. They don't always succeed, but that's the reason that you can walk through the average school and see fewer than 30% of the teachers using new technologies on a routing basis. That's reality. Now, notice that I've spent this entire brief essay, to this point, without mentioning Apple Computer, or their role in education. Apple and Microsoft are red herrings. Wintel clones abound for financial reasons alone. A perceived TCO smaller than X's TCO is what keeps Windows running in the school environment. The charge to schools was simple. Get technology, and get it fast. At first, that meant Apple, because there was not a viable alternative. Windows created the alternative.

I watched as one lab went from 30 Macs and 2 seldom used PC's to a PC house as parent's demanded hardware compatible with what they used at work and could afford at home. Advantage? Windows. There was nothing wrong with the Macs, and certainly nothing that recommended the nascent Windows 3.1 over OS 6. Finance spoke a different story however. Game, point, match.

Still, with 42 years of my life in schools, I've yet to see the killer app that makes one platform the only solution. An X enabled G-4 is however, the most user-friendly and dependable product for the market. As I supposed before, it brings a great deal to the table that a Windows machine doesn't. Yes. It doesn't print as easily to legacy networks (I live in Novell 3.11 world- imagine an iBook there) and file sharing can still be nasty.

I sit at a desk each day though and marvel at that iBook's ability to convert even the staunchest Windows users. There is something to that. Oh, and if you can name that killer? Tell me. It needs to get out.

If you have any questions or comments about this feel free to e-mail me at: tim_hillman@osxfaq.com

Copyright © 2000-2010 Inside Mac Media, Inc. All rights reserved.
Apple assumes no responsibility with regard to the selection, performance, or use of the products or services. All understandings, agreements, or warranties, if any, take place directly between the vendors and prospective users.
Apple, the Apple logo, Mac, PowerMac G4, PowerMac G5, Xserve, Xserve RAID, PowerBook, iBook, Airport, AirPort Extreme, iMac, eMac, iLife, iMovie, iCal, iPhoto, iTunes, QuickTime, FireWire, iPod, iSight, AppleWorks, Macintosh, Jaguar, Panther, Mac OS, Mac OS X and Mac OS X Server are trademarks of Apple Computer, Inc.