DirectNET

Data Center Management Solutions including UPS Systems, Data Center Cooling, KVM over IP & IP Power Strips, Server Racks and Server Rack accessories; KVM Switches and KVM Extenders; Rackmount Monitors and Rackmount Keyboards.


NAVIGATION
Home
Store
INSIDE MAC
Television Shows
Broadcast Shows
Daily News Shows
Special Shows
EVENTS
DAILY TIPS
Design
Mac OS X
Mac OS X UNIX
COMMUNITY
Forums
Surveys
NEWS
Current
Press
Archive
FEATURES
Editorial
Dr. Mac
Reviews
Reader Reports
RESOURCES
FAQ
Documentation
Learning Center
MAN pages
Glossary
Tutorials
Tips
Links

OUR PARTNERS

Editorial - DR. Mac 

Dr. Mac - Ditch that CRT - Flat Baby Flat !!

By Bob LeVitus

I SAID in a recent review that Apple's 23-inch Cinema HD display was by far the best monitor I've ever used and wished I could afford one.

However, I bought the 22-inch NEC tube-type display and used it until this week. But I'm getting ahead of myself.

At 66 pounds, the NEC weighs three times as much as an Apple Cinema. And once I had wrestled the behemoth from its gigantic box onto my desk, I learned that it was also more than twice as deep.

The Cinema left room behind it on my desk for a subwoofer, battery charger, cable modem, USB hub and Ethernet switch. The NEC hung over the back edge of the desk by an inch or two. It may be big, heavy and kind of ugly, but it was also $1,500 cheaper.

Setup was a breeze. The monitor's VGA connector slipped into my G4's video card without additional cables or adapters, and the display fired up bright and strong as soon as I started up my Mac. Except for its bulk and loss of desk space, I was still relatively happy with my decision to go with the "poor man's Cinema display."

It turned out that was the last time I was happy.

The first issue was resolution. NEC promotes this monitor as having a maximum resolution of 1,920 pixels by 1,440 pixels, slightly higher than the $3,499 Apple Cinema HD's 1,920 pixels by 1,200 pixels. It is a lot more than the $2,499 Apple Cinema display at 1,600 pixels by 1,024 pixels. What they don't mention is that you can only use that resolution at a refresh rate of 60 hertz, which makes it flicker so badly that text is nearly unreadable. It wasn't so bad when I reduced the resolution to 1,600 by 1,200, but it wasn't what I thought I was getting. And it wasn't what I wanted.

It got worse. No matter how much I played with the on-screen controls, the image was never as sharp as the flat-screen Cinema display's. Worst of all, text was hard to read at the sizes I was used to on the Cinema display. While it looked OK when I bumped the size up by two or three points, increasing the text size to make it readable defeats the purpose of a big screen.

Last, but definitely not least, the NEC generated much more heat than any flat-panel monitor I've used. The NEC warmed my office by several degrees over the course of a day. The Cinema displays never raised the temperature a bit, even running 24/7.

And so, in the end, I returned the NEC and got a slightly used Cinema display. I think of it as putting my money where my mouth is. The used Cinema display cost twice as much as the new NEC, but after a month of torture by cathode ray tube, I'm convinced it's worth every penny.

Bob LeVitus is a leading authority on Mac OS X and the author of 39 books, including Mac OS X For Dummies and Dr. Mac - The OS X Files, (or, "How to Become a Mac OS X Power User").

Copyright © 2000-2008 Inside Mac Media, Inc. All rights reserved.
Apple assumes no responsibility with regard to the selection, performance, or use of the products or services. All understandings, agreements, or warranties, if any, take place directly between the vendors and prospective users.
Apple, the Apple logo, Mac, PowerMac G4, PowerMac G5, Xserve, Xserve RAID, PowerBook, iBook, Airport, AirPort Extreme, iMac, eMac, iLife, iMovie, iCal, iPhoto, iTunes, QuickTime, FireWire, iPod, iSight, AppleWorks, Macintosh, Jaguar, Panther, Mac OS, Mac OS X and Mac OS X Server are trademarks of Apple Computer, Inc.